Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Ever Wonder if Your Mom was a Double? Part 1



           In 1923 there was an unusual case in Paris of a woman who complained to the police that there were strange children imprisoned in her basement. She was also convinced that there were more children imprisoned throughout the city. Her delusional state consisted of an elaborate system which centered around two main themes: first, the belief that she had been substituted at birth and was an heiress. Second, the belief of an elaborate plot against her that involved thefts, poisonings, changes in her body’s appearance and substitutions of her family, herself and others in her environment (Sinkman, 2008). Accompanying her misidentification symptoms were psychotic features, persecutory hallucinations and other signs of severe mental illness.  This odd set of symptoms caught the attention of French psychiatrist Joseph Capgras. Capgras’ and Reboul-Lachaux’s research on this woman, later referred to as Mme M., eventually became the basis for a new set of disorders, categorized as “misidentity” or “false identity” syndromes.
Delusional Misidentity Syndrome
            Research with Mme. M led subsequent researchers to discover a whole range of disorders which they classified as Delusional Misidentity Syndrome (DMS). Included in the category is, firstly, Fregoli Syndrome (FS), in which a patient “holds the belief that a persecutor takes on the appearance of various people at different times” (Sinkman, 2008). FS can be associated with a persecutory misidentification of people; however, this is not always the case. It can also be an over-misidentification of one face on others. FS can also extend to misidentification of places as well as people. Second is Intermetamorphosis Syndrome, where the patient believes that an individual can transform into another person. Third, Cotard Syndrome, a disorder consisting of the delusional perception that one is dead or that a particular body part is dead (Berrios & Luque, 1995). Finally, Capgras Syndrome (CS), which will be discussed in detail later on. Variations of misidentity syndromes have arisen in the past; nevertheless, those listed above are the main syndromes within the DMS category. Patients who are diagnosed with a misidentity syndrome often have co-occurring or comorbid disorders such as schizophrenia and paranoia, or other misidentity syndromes (Fialkov & Robins, 1978; Koritar & Steiner, 1988).
Capgras Syndrome
            Capgras Syndrome defined by Joseph Capgras was “the illusion of doubles” (Enoch & Ball, 2001). A current definition of classic Capgras syndrome is a state in which “the patient believes that a person usually closely related to him has been replaced by an exact double” (Nejad & Toofani, 2006). Since Capgras Syndrome was first discovered, there has been a dichotomy in thinking. Some believe the source of CS to be psychological; while others believe it to be organic, resulting from a brain lesion or atrophy (Gluckman, 1968).  Unfortunately, the bulk of research since CS was discovered has shed little light onto the neurological causes. It’s only been very recent that neurological research has been conducted on the disorder. So far explanations for its etiology have varied from “neuro-psychiatric or organic and neurological diseases, including dementia, head trauma, epilepsy, cerebrovascular disease, neurodegenerative disease, most commonly lewy body disease and multiple sclerosis” (Bourget, & Whitehurst, 2004). Behavioral and psychodynamic explanations for Capgras range from “psychosis, paranoia, pathological splitting of a significant other, and changes in the crucial interpersonal relationship” (Berson, 1983).


Monday, March 11, 2013

What is TANF? Part 2


               Having examined the presuppositional worldviews that precede liberal and conservative policy-making decisions and future goals in the last blogpost, I will now discuss the resultant policies from each ideology that I support or disagree with. The position that I do agree with the newly formed Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF) is that states are now able to make determinations about to whom and how much aid is given. ADFC, TANF's predecessor, provided federal assistance to needy families and individuals, unlike TANF which is now at the state level.  I also agree with TANF's four purposes: that children are cared for in their own homes, to reduce dependency on welfare (by providing assistance, through marriage or work), preventing out-of-wedlock pregnancies, and formation and maintenance of 2 parent families. The focus is on enabling and empowering individuals and families who are needy to work and ultimately provide for themselves. There is no reason why someone who can work and provide for themselves should receive aid that will enable dependency on the system.
            Obviously this purpose has its limitations, for example single mothers. Single mothers have to work a certain amount of hours per week, but this means that the mother will have to spend money on childcare, have no time with their children and always be financially challenged. This brings up another purpose of TANF, which is reducing the number of people on welfare and not reducing poverty. Unfortunately dependency on welfare has decreased, but the issue of poverty persists. Also, TANF only sponsors education for a limited number of vocations (nurse, secretary etc…) instead of increasing human capital.
            Overall, TANF is not a perfect program, there are aspects of it that are great and some that just don't work. I myself take an integrationist approach, I would reduce dependency on welfare by empowering those who can work to work, while at the same time not being so rigid that a person has no quality of life because of this expectation, some allotments should made individually.



Helpful Website Resources for Premarital and Married Couples, and Families



CYFERnet – www.cyfernet.org
(Description provided by the handout).

Fighting for Your Marriage- the PREP Approach www.prepinc.com
 (Description provided by the handout).

Health and Age – www.healthandage.com
 (Description provided by the handout).

Marriage Alive – www.marriagealive.org
(Description provided by the handout).

Marriage and Couple Relationship Website – http://citnews.unl.edu/marriage/
(Description provided by the handout).

Marriage Builders – www.marriagebuilders.com
(Description provided by the handout).

Michele Weiner Davis – www.divorcebusting.com
(Description provided by the handout).

National Council on Family Relations – www.ncfr.org
(Description provided by the handout).

PREPARE/ENRICH Program – www.lifeinnovations.com
(Description provided by the handout).

Real Relationships- www.realrelationships.com
(Description provided by the handout).

Smart Marriages – www.smartmarriages.com
(Description provided by the handout).

Stepfamily Association of America – www.saafamilies.org
(Description provided by the handout).

Focus on the Family – www.focusonthefamily.com
Provides short and comprehensive articles on various topics relating to marriage. Offers podcasts, times for broadcasts, newsletters, online community and bookstore. One of the main selling points of this website is that you can create a personalized webpage and e-newsletter for your family.

Crown Financial Ministries – www.crown.org
Offers financial resources and tools for financial planning. Locate local budget coaches, read articles concerning financial “hot topics”, listen to free downloadable podcasts on finances. Sells financial literature for couples along with a newsletter.

Blended Families – www.blended-families.com/
Addresses the issues encountered by blended families through a myriad of literature, free newsletter, booking for seminars, remarriage coaching by trained professionals and teleclasses.

Parent Trust For Washington Children – www.parenttruts.org
Comprehensive advice index on a variety of parenting categories (i.e. child development, early learning, health safety, stress management etc…). Also an online video about planning for a family, other options are ideas for fun family activities, education resources (telephone support, new parent services, child and teen services, notifications of community events). Lists books and local classes.

FamilyFun.com – http://familyfun.go.com/
A site filled with fun activities that the whole family can participate in such as game ideas, crafts, how-to videos, travel resources etc…

National Healthy Marriage Resource Center – http://www.healthymarriageinfo.org/
Specializes in providing research, statistics, information about national programs, initiatives and provides an “online library for resources related to research and issues impacting Healthy Marriage.”

FindingStone Counseling Center: A Family Stress Test - http://www.findingstone.com/services/tests/familystresstest.htm
A measurement to help evaluate family stress levels.

Central Oregon Family Resource Center – http://www.frconline.org/about.html
Offers resources for parents and families living in Oregon, other resources are parenting education, community resources and referrals. 

What Factors are Present in Alcoholism?

            The perception of alcohol abuse within our culture has been on both sides of the spectrum, it has gone from the moral model, in which the alcohol abuser had freewill in the matter and made the wrong decision. We have now made a 180 degree turn to the medical model, which advocates that alcohol abusers had no choice in the matter because they were driven by a biological vulnerability for addiction. Alcohol abuse and dependence outside the United States can vary, Peru has a 35% of alcohol abuse and dependence, South Korea is 22%, Taipei is 3.5% and in Shanghai its 0.45%.  
           Alcohol is a depressant and a dis-inhibitor.  When alcohol is ingested it acts upon several systems in the brain, it interferes with GABA neurotransmitters, which are associated with anxiety. Also with Glutamate neurotransmitters, which when affected can account for the blackouts and memory loss that many alcoholics experience. Alcohol also interacts with Serotonin neurotransmitters, which are associated with mood, sleep and eating behaviors. Long-term drinking can have severe effects on other organs in the body such as the liver, pancreatitis, cardiovascular disease and dementia. 
        To have the view that Alcohol dependence is one or the other, moral choice or disease, is short sighted and limited. One's body never made someone take a drink, however, over a long period of alcohol ingestion our bodies can become dependent on the substance. We must understand alcoholism as a psychological, social and biological problem as well. People drink because it helps them be social, or it eases emotional pain, its a biological necessity from long-term drinking, or a host of other factors. The fact of the matter is that its not just one thing, but a mixture of many factors.

Sunday, March 10, 2013

What is TANF? Part I


What is TANF?
              Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) is a government program that gives cash assistance to needy families with dependent children, and to pregnant women, to help them meet the basic needs of their children. This cash assistance can be used to help families with housing, utilities, and clothing costs. It is sometimes called "welfare." In New Mexico the TANF program is often referred to as NMWorks (NMW). TANF is a time-limited program. Most people are allowed to get TANF benefits for no more than 60 months during their lifetime. Some people, such as people with permanent disabilities, can get a hardship extension of benefits (http://www.newmexicoresources.org/pages.cfm?ContentID=17&pageID=4&Subpages='yes'&DynamicID=348).
Who Runs the TANF Program?
              The TANF program is a federal program, managed by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) in the U.S. government. This federal department gives money to each state in the form of a block grant each year to provide TANF for its residents. In New Mexico, the Income Support Division (ISD) of the Human Services Department (HSD) is in charge of the state TANF program. Indian tribes may choose to operate their own Tribal TANF programs (http://www.newmexicoresources.org/pages.cfm?ContentID=17&pageID=4&Subpages='yes'&DynamicID=348).
Political Worldviews
             Throughout the history of TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) there was been a competition waged by two vying social and political worldviews. This difference was most readily seen in the administrations of Presidents John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan. Former President Kennedy came from and promoted a liberal political worldview. When speaking of poverty liberal ideology takes the position that we live in a “national” community. This mindset caters to national legislation and the creation of services solely devoted to solving social ills such as poverty. One possible outcome from this worldview put into practice is that the legislative body passing such laws and creating these services are removing the responsibility of the local community and in essence over-reaching its ordained power.
            This leads us to the conservative political worldview best represented in the administration of former President Reagan. When speaking of poverty, the conservative ideology views poverty as a “local” community issue, placing the burden of responsibility on the state, county, city, town, church and family. In terms of legislation the goal is to reduce national assistance and services, thus encouraging local entities and persons to action on behalf of their local community’s needs. One possible outcome of this worldview is that people don’t take responsibility for the needy in their community and so these people go un-helped. With this background information in mind it is much easier to understand the actions taken by both Presidents, Kennedy bolstering the ADC and Reagan scaling back the CETA.
Breaking Down TANF Information
            Here's a few charts that display information in regards to TANF. The chart below shows how many people on TANF get a job after leaving TANF:

The chart below shows the expenditures and budget for TANF recipients:

How We See Our Bodies


           What Influences how we view our own bodies and the bodies of others? What basis do we use to judge? What basis do we use to be happy or dissatisfied with our bodies? There is a disorder in the DSM IV-TR called Body Dysmorphic Disorder, also known as BDD. It is defined as “a preoccupation with some imagined defect in appearance by someone who actually looks reasonably normal” (Abnormal Psychology, pg. 185). The presence of this disorder in our society serve to illustrate a point of how we see ourselves and others. We have a distorted basis for judging an attractive or fit body, and because of that we have created undue pain for ourselves. The warning signs for BDD include:

·         Constantly picking at the skin or touching the face
·         Spending excessive time trying to hide the perceived defect with clothing or makeup
·         Constantly comparing body parts to others and seeking reassurance
·         Having problems at work or school because of being overly self-conscious
·         Seeking out multiple dermatologists or plastic surgeons 
(http://www.everydayhealth.com/eating-disorders/distorted-perspective-of-body-dysmorphic-disorder.aspx)

Possible causes may be:
·         Having a close biological relative with body dysmorphic disorder
·         Being teased or bullied as a child
·         Low self-esteem
·         Having an anxious temperament 
(http://www.everydayhealth.com/eating-disorders/distorted-perspective-of-body-dysmorphic-disorder.aspx)



           However, there are two possible causes I would like to look at in detail, that is culture and gender. First, depending upon the culture and or sex of the person dealing with BDD, the definition will remain fairly static, but the presenting symptoms will be modified. Culture is the reason for this modification, for example in Western culture especially with, but not limited, to women there is an overwhelming concern with being thin. However we are seeing some change in this trend. Traditionally men have been expected to attain the "V" shape body type, and women the hourglass body shape. Both men and women are feeling the pressure to conform to an "I" body shape. Historically, people in our culture have struggled with BDD, but are dissatisfied with different body parts and shapes, and this is due to the fluctuating nature of idealized body types in our culture.
          These shapes are obviously not universal law of attractiveness since so many other cultures do not hold these same standards, for example the African-American community highly values a very curvaceous and voluptuous female figure. Other examples range from the Ugandans and Ethiopians inserting large disks into their lower lips to women in Burma wearing brass neck rings to lengthen their necks. And as I've said, these cultural values are subject to change.
           The second factor that influences how we see our bodies is gender. In Western culture when it comes to body image men usually focus on genitals, receding hairline, body building and muscle defects. As opposed to women who tend to focus on breasts, hips and waist size and who predominately develop eating disorders to fit into the mold. Gender like culture plays a significant role in how we perceive our bodies. 
Reference
 Barlow, David H. & Durand, V. Mark (2008).   Abnormal Psychology: An Integrated Approach, CengageNOW™

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Understanding the Diagnostic Statistical Manual


            The mulitaxial diagnostic system was first introduced in the DSM-III-R, which evaluates and diagnoses clients on a multi-dimensional level. The multiaxial diagnostic system evaluates a person on five axes or dimensions, allowing the clinician to have a more complete picture of a person. A person may have a psychological disorder that may not affect their functionality, using this model would allow a clinician to come to a better determination than previous models.
            In the current DSM (DSM-IV-TR) the five axes of the multiaxial diagnostic system are: developmental disorders, learning disorders, motor skills disorders and communication disorders are categorized as Axis I. Axis II is personality disorders and mental retardation, Axis 3 is physical disorders and conditions, Axis 4 is psychosocial and environmental problems and Axis 5 which is clinician rated level of adaptive functioning.
           For example, a clinician using the multiaxial model to evaluate a client with OCD, would classify the client as having an Axis 1 category disorder. Yet the process doesn't end here, the client could be dealing with multiple problems related or non-related to his OCD. Let's suppose upon further inquiry it becomes clear that he also suffers from Schizoid personality disorder, which is an Axis 2 category disorder. The man did not have any physical conditions so no diagnosis is needed for Axis 3. In his Axis 4 assessment, the client was dealing with occupational difficulties and marital problems. And the clinicians rated score of the client's functionality was a 55, which shows slight obstruction with his functioning. The patients presenting symptoms and subsequent diagnosis require some information and guidance for treatment, but in light of the multiaxial model just demonstrated the clinician has a clear idea of what the problem is and how to treat the patient. 
         As a side not, this is all likely to change in the very near future since the DSM V is coming out with an entirely new system for diagnosing clients. 

Popular Posts