What
happens to children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder when they
become adults? Do the symptoms vanish with adulthood? The reality of the
situation is that “90% (Bierdman et al)of adults diagnosed with ADHD in
childhood report continued low levels of overall functioning”(Wadsworth &
Harper, pp. 102). The disadvantages of hyperactivity and impulsivity, which
characterize children with ADHD, usually fade away as children become adults.
The defining characteristics of ADHD in adults are under stimulation and
inattentiveness, which can lead to various social, relational and occupational
difficulties. The ADHD of childhood and
the ADHD of adulthood are two very different things with very different
approaches to treatment. This is an
important distinction to make; one cannot apply a treatment model for ADHD
children to ADHD adult. This will not
only be ineffective, but it could also adversely affect adult patients to not
seek treatment and live with the difficulties of ADHD with shame and lack of
medical treatment. The scope of this report will cover types of treatment
measures for adults with ADHD, they are: psychotherapy/cognitive-behavioral
skill training and preventative disclosure strategies. But before different
types of treatment approaches and measures are to be considered, an
understanding of the background and diagnosis of ADHD in adults is necessary.
In the early nineteen hundreds some physicians thought
the behaviors that we now recognize as ADHD disorder behaviors were a lack of
morality and a resistance to accept the surrounding cultural expectations. Two
decades later other physicians began to make the link between these behaviors
and neurobiological damage or disorder, particularly in the cerebrum. This
sparked more research that would eventually recognize the correlation between
impulsivity and hyperactivity in children and “neurobiological disorder of the
frontal lobe” (Quinn et al 1995). The sad truth is that the majority of parents
with ADHD pass on those dysfunctional genes to their children. The
neurobiological disorder manifests itself in abnormal behaviors that we all
have seen in a friend or co-worker, but what is really happening inside the
mind of someone with ADHD? “The hyperactive and inattentive behaviors in adults
are thought to be the result of an under-responsive regulation of
neurotransmitters or neurotransmitter functions in the prefrontal cortex” (Erk
2000). This is the neurobiological disorder that children and adults have
within their neurological makeup, having this disorder hinders the patients
from doing many things that we who have normative neurobiological makeups take
for granted. “The clinical expression of the under-responsive behavioral
inhibition system includes the inability to prioritize and implement four
executive functions: (a) nonverbal working memory, (b) internalization of
self-directed speech, (c) self-regulation of mood and arousal, and (d)
reconstitution of the component parts of observed behaviors”(Barkely,1997).
Little
to none research has been done on adults with ADHD; even though the diagnosis
of ADHD is prevalent in our culture. The majority of studies and treatment
plans have been for children, but no one has worked at solutions to the
problems adults face with ADHD. “It is important to note, however, that those
with behavioral disturbances (such as ADHD) face stigmatization, which may play
a role in the social difficulties they experience (Crisp, Gelder, Rix, Meltzer,
& Rowlands, 2000). Research has demonstrated that the general public
endorses stigmatizing attitudes towards individuals with psychological
disorders and that this stigmatization often results in negative outcomes such
as rejection, social withdrawal, and exacerbation of psychiatric symptoms
(Schumacher, Corrigan, & Delong, 2003).”
The options for treatment plans are few and the social and occupational
difficulties can feel overwhelming. That’s what motivated a research team to
look for ways that these adults can alleviate and cope with the stigmatizations
of ADHD behaviors. A treatment plan was proposed, the main focus would be an
attitude change in the patients. This is manifested by the proactive approach
of “Preventative disclosure-an attempt to counteract social stigma by
selectively using both concealment and disclosure of one’s condition” (Joachim
& Acorn, 2000; Troster, 1997). The idea is that by disclosing one’s
condition early on in a social interaction would hopefully prevent misattribution
by peers or stigmatization by the public. What makes this study unique is that
a preventative disclosure study has never been done for young adults with ADHD;
the treatment has only been applied to those with other chronic illnesses. This
study had 306 participants, around half were female, and the age range was from
18-26 with an average age of 22.5. The participants had to fill out a survey
consisting of vignettes “The vignettes differed according to a two (ADHD
symptom presentation: hyperactivity vs. inattentive) by two (preventative
disclosure of disorder vs. nondisclosure) design.”(Jastrowski et al). The
results of the study produced some very significant observations about this
method. “There was a large effect of preventative disclosure in socially
rejecting attitudes and a medium effect on beliefs that characters would
benefit from treatment… First, the data indicate that individuals with ADHD who
disclose their diagnosis may prevent negative social consequences, such as
social rejection.”(Jastrowski et al). Of course this preventative treatment is
not a cure, but it is an effective way of dealing with one aspect of the
difficulties that adults with ADHD deal with. The researchers suggest more
studies are needed to be conducted with a greater diversity so that these
results may be more generalized.
In
this section the psychotherapy/cognitive-behavioral skills treatment plan for
adults with ADHD will be discussed. A
pilot study was conducted by Hesslinger et al 2002, in this research study researchers
recognized that there were no Psychotherapeutic and behavioral skills studies
being done or that have been done. They
decided to perform a study that analyzed how Adults who fit the DSM-IV criteria
for ADHD disorder would respond to Psychotherapy involving cognitive-behavioral
treatment. What they decided to use was the “DBT” or Dialectical Behavioral
Therapy first developed by Linehan et al 1993. This treatment plan is usually
used for those dealing with Borderline Personality Disorder; this treatment
plan was chosen because often times those who have BDP exhibit similar
psychopathologies with those who have ADHD. Such behaviors include “deficits in
affect regulation, impulse control, substance abuse, low self-esteem, and
disturbed interpersonal relationship are common in both conditions.”(Hesslinger
et al 2002). Before introducing the test
subjects to the treatment and DBT program they first modified it by conducting
a pre-treatment group of ADHD adults who went through the treatment. After going
conducting sessions with the test subjects they modified the DBT so that it
would be geared more to ADHD. The test consisted of eight participants, 5 male
and 3 female, their age range was 19-44 with an average age of 31.9. Two of the
participants were on medication at the time, Methylphenidate and
anti-depressants, participants with ADHD participating in research studies with
medication is common due to misdiagnoses, anti-depressants and or new stimulant
drugs that are being newly developed. The treatment developed by Hesslinger et
al were conducted in a group setting, the contents of the treatment included
various skills: mindfulness was the first skill learned, the source of this
skill was from the DBT program. “In DBT there are three “what” skills (observing,
describing, participating) and three “how” skills (taking a nonjudgmental
stance, focusing on one thing at a time, being effective)” (Linehan M et al).
The second skill that the participants learned was “Chaos and Control”,
essentially it is a perspective change for the patient, learning how to take
control of their ADHD instead of letting it take control of them. The third step was a whole process of
analyzing behaviors that the patients wanted to change, this involved “detailed
and precise description of the behavior, preceding events, predisposing
constellations,” etc… (Hesslinger et al). The next step was more educational;
participants were taught how ADHD can create emotional stability. This step had
them using a journal to record their thoughts and education on emotional
regulation. The other steps of the
treatment involved education with skill training, they were skills of impulse
control, dealing with stress, substance dependency, how ADHD affects one’s
personal relationships, and the some sessions involved family members and
significant others in these sessions. The results of the treatment were
extremely positive, on several skill inventories and a depression scale all the
patients had scores that showed significant improvement. Not only were the
numbers positive, but
“The treatment was generally
regarded as helpful and, in particular, as very specific for the deficits that
patients experienced. Patients felt better educated and felt they were better
able to cope with ADHD. All patients stated that the setting as a group was
most helpful. Psychoeducation, the therapists, and the exercises were mentioned
as further helpful factors in a descending order. The rating of the different
therapy modules mentioned above was very heterogeneous; however, none of the
modules was assessed as unhelpful.”(Hesslinger et al 2002).
The success of this
study is also evident by how many dropouts they had, none and many wanted to
continue the therapy. This is an astounding lack of dropout rate considering
the disadvantages of the subject group’s tendencies towards lack of persistence
and instability. There were some drawbacks to the study; mainly the study’s low
sample number creates a difficulty in trying to generalize the findings to the
whole adult ADHD population. There are also limitations to this study as well;
many behavioral treatment measures have been tested on children with no
significant results. This means that the treatment cannot be universalized to
children; this seems to be true because children lack the self motivation that
the adults do. But the successes of this study cannot be overlooked, if
anything this pilot study should be the harbinger for many more studies like it
to come along and the treatment to be more widely used in ADHD adults.
Even though not many studies have been done in the past
on adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, the future looks hopeful due
to the growing interest in researching this population. Many research teams are
now taking a closer look at the problems and solutions of this disorder.
Psychotherapy/Cognitive-behavioral skills training proved to have significant
results as well did the Preventative disclosure approach. These and hopefully
many more treatment options will be available to adults with ADHD.
References:
Biederman,
J. (2000). Impact of comorbidity in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity
disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 152, 431-435.
Quinn,
D. Q. (1995). Neurobiology of attention deficit disorder. In K.G. Nadeau (Ed.),
A comprehensive guide to attention deficit disorder in adults: Research,
diagnosis, and treatment (pp. 18-31). New York : Brunnel Mazel.
Erk,
R. R. (2000). Five frameworks for increasing understanding and effective
treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Predominately
inattentive type. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78, 389-399.
Barkely,
R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibitions, sustained attention, and executive
functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin,
121, 65-94.
Linehan.
M. (1993a). Cognitive-behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. The
Guilford Press, New York .
Linehan.
M. (1993b). Skills Training Manual for Treating Borderline Personality
Disorder. The Guilford Press, New York .
Hesslinger
B, Tebartz van Elst L, Nyberg E., D. P, Richter H, Berner M, Ebert D (2000). Psychotherapy
of attention deficit hyperactivity disaster in adults: A pilot study using a
structured skills training program. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci,
252, 177-184.
Hallowell,
EM. & Ratey J. (1994). Driven to Distraction. Pantheon Books, New York .
Crisp,
A.H., Gelder, M.G., Rix, S., Meltzer, H. I., & Rowlands, O. J. (2000).
Stigmatisation of people with mental illnesses. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 177, 4-7.
Schumacher,
M., Corrigan, P. W., & Delong, T. (2003). Examining cues that signal mental
illness stigma. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22, 467-476.
Joachim,
G., & Acorn, S. (2000). Stigma of visible and invisible chronic conditions.
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 243-248.
Troster, H. (1997).
Disclose or conceal? Strategies or information management in persons with
epilepsy. Epilepsia, 38, 1227-1237.
Jastrowski, K. E., Berlin , K. S., Sato, Amy F., Davies, W. Hobart (2007). Disclosure of
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder May Minimize Risk of Social Rejection.
Psychiatry, 70, 274-282.
No comments:
Post a Comment