“Discipling is a relational process
in which a more experienced follower of Christ shares with a newer believer the
commitment, understanding, and basic skills necessary to know and obey Jesus
Christ as Lord.” (Connecting: The
Mentoring Relationships You Need to Succeed, p. 48). I totally agree with
Stanley and Clinton, I think from all the Biblical data we can gather that
Jesus left us with a basis and methodology for disipling. The primary aspect of
Jesus’ discipleship with the twelve was relational, this composes the basis,
and giving of the self on the part of the discipler, this composes the
methodology. For further support of this matrix of seeing Discipleship observe
what Robert E. Coleman had to say on the topic, “Having called his men, Jesus
made it a practice to be with them. This was the essence of His training
program—just letting His disciples follow Him” (p. 38).
First
of all, as to the basis of discipleship, it is important know that God is a
relational God; this statement needs little refutation, but for those who need
convincing there are a few key passages that demonstrates this fact. God established
relationship with His people through an ancient of form of connection called a
Covenant. What a covenant created was a permanent and binding relationship between
the Suzerain and a Vassal based on the Vassals adherence to certain stipulations,
based on the Vassals obedience or disobedience there would be blessings or cursings
(Deut. 28). We can see a primary example of this in the Mosaic covenant (Ex.
19:3-6, 20:1-6). God created a relationship with the Chosen people, the Israelites,
in this way so that they would understand. It was an accommodation on God’s
part to work in such a way that humans would understand, therefore His reason
for using a human convention. But we must understand that before this formal
and conditional relationship started as we can see in Exodus, there was a more
intimate and personal foundation laid between God and Abraham.
In
Genesis 12:1-3 God made a permanent, unchanging and unconditional promise to
Abraham, that He would give him land, nation and blessing. And that this
blessing would be a blessing for the whole world. This relationship was not
determined by obedience or merit, God chose simply because He chose. God loves
simply because He loves. God chose, loved and acted in this relational way
simply because it is His character to do so, and because of that we can always
always trust Him. We need not be afraid that God will one day abandon us or
desert us based on our actions or failings. If that were the case, then God
would have checked out long ago, but He hasn’t, and we can be confident of that
because of His character and ongoing work in human history. This relational
foundation of love was the basis for the Mosaic, Davidic and New covenants and everything
else God affected in the lives of humans and our history. It also provides us
with a basis discipleship as I said before. We are to reflect God in the way we
disciple others, and we have the best example of that in Jesus Christ. Jesus
came to earth and manifested in human form what God had been doing since
creation, which was being loving and relational.
Second, Jesus’
methodology with the twelve was unique simply because He didn’t use a
methodology. His methodology what
Himself, He lived out God’s will and let the disciples experience Him as lived
and endured various circumstances. This provides for us a methodology of
allowing others to be with us as we follow God, for others to see how we
experience hardship and turn to God, and for others to learn as we obey God.
Essentially, letting others do life with us as we follow God. I love this
because it adheres with the truth that God has uniquely and wonderfully made
each one of us. That is to say, in the diversity of our beings we reflect the
glory of God. Consider the scene in Revelation of people from all over the
world, coming various cultures and languages all giving glory and praise to
God.
“After this I looked, and there
before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation,
tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb.
They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands. And
they cried out in a loud voice:
“Salvation belongs to our God,
who sits on the throne,
and to the Lamb” (Revelation 7:9-10).
I think the
picture shows us that we glorify God best in our composite diversity,
displaying the magnificent creativity of God and His love for all kinds of
people. We individually and collectively reflect something of our Creator; this
concept in the Bible is called the Imago
Dei. Therefore it would stand to reason, within the bounds of Scriptural
truth, that our own beings communicate something of God to others, in what He
has done in our lives, the truths He has revealed to us experientially, our
intellects, personalities and ways we live obediently to God. So it wouldn’t
make sense then to have one standard model that everyone had to conform to. If
that were the case, we would have one bland representation of a disciple and
discipleship. Many would not be able to be a disciple because they would have
to cleave off certain aspects of themselves in order to follow Christ.
Now, do not confuse what I’m saying
in terms of standards of obedience, those are not transitory or relative. We
are all conforming ourselves to Christ in the way He obeyed and submitted
Himself to the Father, but I would argue that submission and obedience will
look differently person to person. As an example, for some it may be easy to
tithe, money is not an object of worship for them, but for another it is a huge
struggle. For the person who doesn’t struggle with tithing, their obedience t God
in that regard requires little submission of their will, even though he ought
to do it. However, for the one who does struggle, if he submitted to God through
his tithing, that would be cause for celebration and praising him as a
disciple, because he submitted his will to the Father even when He did not want
to, thus showing that obedience is far better and important than personal
comfort.
In
our culture, believers are uncomfortable saying, “Be imitators of me, as I am
of Christ” (I Cor. 11:1). However, the Bible has no problems establishing the
discipler as the one to be followed by the disciple. When submit our wills to
the Father and obey Him, we are essentially being “little” Christs to each
other. Because of this Paul can said with confidence, “Be imitators of me”, this
would be by our standards arrogant. But in the logic of the Bible, this makes
absolute sense, for when believers are assembled we are then called the body of
Christ. Individually and collectively we reflect Jesus when we obey and we are
to follow each other as they follow Christ (I Thess. 1:6, 2:14, I Cor. 4:16,
Eph. 4:32, 5:1-2). This assemblage we would call the church, and it suggest
something more than a one-to-one relational model of discipleship, but one of
mutuality, where each member is concern and actively working to take care of
the needs of others. A body that grows and supports itself, which means the job
of discipling is not up to a select few, but of the many. In other words,
disciples are to be discipled and then disciple others. “The form of discipleship Jesus intended for his
disciples was unique, and it was not intended only for the time when they could
follow him physically; it was also intended for the time when they would gather
as the church” (Wilkins, p. 309).
In summary, the basis for
discipleship ought to be relationships, and the method ought to be the
discipler gives themselves to the disciple. If one can do this they are
following the pattern God has set since the foundation of the world with His
chosen people, and living out the example that Jesus has set for us. Discipleship
can only truly be done in the presence of others. A key principle of
discipleship is mutuality. And so the standard ought to be a disciple who is discipled
in turn disciples others, in other words an organism where the whole provides
for the needs of the parts. This is the living dynamic body that Jesus and the
Apostles spoke of as the church.
No comments:
Post a Comment