This study discussed the effects
that a dysfunctional family-of-origin has on premarital couples and the
maladaptive behaviors brought henceforth into future marriages. Many factors
lead to marital dissolution and unhappiness, however, one of the leading causal
factors in marital discord is hostile conflict. Researchers (Amato, 1996;
Holman & Birch, 2001) have shown that disrupted and dysfunctional
family-of-origin histories exert influence on future marital discord if issues
are not recognized and worked through. I've heard it said that families are the
laboratory of life, which means that we do most of our learning in the family
context. The family is where we do the majority of leaning that impacts the
rest of our lives. I think of it like training, the way your family of origin deals
and respond to conflict teaches us how to deal with and respond to conflict in
future relationships. How families manage money, perceive time, work, love,
affection and so on affects all our future relationships.
Many people who come from
"broken" family contexts leave thinking that they're leave all the
drama, conflict and pain behind, only to unwittingly respond to future issues
in similar ways they did when in their family context. Wherever we go we take
with us all our past hurts, joys, pains, relationships, events and actions.
Our response to various stimuli is a complex interaction of past
events, actions and relationships with the new set of variables. This isn't to
say that we don't grow and change, but to some varying degrees, we can never
extricate ourselves from our family contexts. Our past and memories largely
constitute our identity.
The intention of this study was to
understand was to demonstrate empirically what was discussed above, how “select
family-of-origin variables, measured premaritally, were predictive of hostile
conflict in early marriage” (Topham, Larson & Holman, 2005). For
premarital couples, having an understanding of what factors may cause hostile
marital conflict in their future marriage would be incredibly valuable
information. Unfortunately little to no research has been conducted on the
connection between premarital factors and marital hostile conflict, there have
only been correlations discovered between premarital factors and marital
dissolution and unhappiness.
The theoretical frameworks Topham
et al based their hypotheses on were Social Learning theory, Multi-generational
family theory and Attachment theory. Each of these theories look at the role
family-of-origin play in offspring’s future marital satisfaction, stability and
the transmission of dangerous behaviors. Six hypotheses were tested but for the
sake of brevity I will only mention those which provided statistical
significance. The predictive factors for marital conflict included the wives’
family-of-origin environment and approach to discipline. This reinforces the
notion that wives are the “gate-keepers” of marriage relationships, since those
factors didn't significantly affect husbands. Topham et al proposed this may
be that after marriage the wife's family maintains active contact with their
daughter and new husband. This, in general, is not true of the husband’s family,
they tend to "let go" easier. Therefore, it is likely that unhealthy behaviors,
relationships and mindsets are maintained because of the wives’ continued
contact with her family. This has been consistent with my own observations as well.
The theories were well chosen for
the issue of research and provided much insight into the phenomenon. The
importance of this study is that it provides a tool for couples coming from
dysfunctional families, allowing them to consciously recognize their family’s
influence on their behavior and cognitions, and take steps to ensure a stronger
and better informed marriage. To be forewarned is to be forearmed. The better
understanding one can have of the problem, the more effectively one can step towards healing and growth.
References:
Amato, P. R.
(1996). Explaining the intergenerational transmission of divorce, Journal
of Marriage and the Family, 58, 628–640.
Holman, T. B.
& Birch, P. J. (2001). Family-of-origin structures and processes and adult
children’s marital quality. In T. B. Holman & Associates (Eds.), Premarital
prediction of marital quality or break up: Research, theory, and
practice. New York: Plenum Press.
Topham, G. L., Larson, J. H.,
& Holman, T. B. (2005).
Family-of-origin predictors of hostile conflict in early marriage, Contemporary
Family Therapy: An International Journal, 27, 101-121.
No comments:
Post a Comment